🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."